Bui,+Joseph


 * US approves killing US-born cleric**

Anwar al-Awlaki a cleric and a US citizen is being aimed at for being apart of planning attacks on the US. He was connected to the attempted bombing of an airline for the US and also a shooting that occurred on the US Army base. He was born in New Mexico and then later on became the leader of mosques in California, Colorado, and Virginia. Awlaki became well known for his preaching in English in which supported the use of violence as a religious duty. During one of his lectures while being an imam (leader of a mosque) in San Diego, two of the 9/11 hijackers attended. After that, he flew to the US in 2007 and then later on moved to Yemen. The US used to see him as a radival Islamist preacher, but now they say that he is an effective recruiter for al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. He was also connected to the suspects in the shooting that killed 13 people, in Fort Hood last November. Not only that but failed at an attempt to bomb a transatlantic airliner on Christmas day. The US is planning on attacking him with an remote controlled aerial vehicle. The US is already approved for this act.

Sources: "BBC News:<[]>. Arab News//:// <[]>.

Compare & Contrast: Both of these articles have the general information. They both show that the US is approving the killing of Anwar al-Awlaki, they actually both have information about how he was linked to the shooting in Fort hood,including the 9/11 attackers. The differences between the articles are the titles, BBC's is "US approves killing US-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki" whereas Arab News' title is "US approves targeted killing of American cleric". Arab News' focus seemed to be on how the CIA is involved in this and also kept talking about a "list" and BBC did not mention the CIA much, neither did they mention anything about a "list". BBC had pictures too which makes it good for people who are reading, so they know who they're reading about, it actually gives them an image of him. Arab News included no pictures whatsoever.

My opinion: Killing him was a good idea but I think he should've been in jail for life and has to do some certain amount of community service hours.Killing someone is harsh but he kind of deserve it. At least some of the threat has disappear for some people.


 * Marine Life Trade Tops Cites Agenda**

An International conference in Doha to tackle export of Atlantic bluefin tuna, sharks, and polar bear skin. Monaco's proposal is to have ban on export of the Atlantic bluefin tuna. Japan and Australia are one of a few countries that are refusing to totally banning the export. Sharks are being sought for additional protection and also, U.S. are seeking to increase the protection of polar bears. The thirteen day meeting is going to be held in the Middle East and one hundred-twenty out of one hundred-seventy five state members will be attending to be discussing about these issues.

The two sources I used for this article was Al Jazeera and Quote. The similarities between these two sources were that they both involve the same species (Atlantic bluefin tuna, sharks, and polar bears). Also, they mention the same countries that are a part of these and the meeting in Doha. There were so many differences. Quote had statistics about the animals and was more into detail. Quote had past dates to compare now and back then. Also, both article talked about U.S. differently. Quote said that the U.S. is seeking complete ban on export of polar bear but Al Jazeera says that the U.S. are seeking to increase the protection of polar bears. I feel as if Quote is more trustworthy because it goes more into depth and explains things. This can slightly affect my opinion (next paragraph).

My opinion on this article is that if some states don't want to have ban on the exports, they should compromise and try to work something out. They could like cut back on exporting the specific type of species. Also, polar bears are already in deep water because of global warming, why poach them when they are decreasing. This is only increasing their extinction. If they were to ban the exports of these magnificient creatures, this can harm cultures of some countries. So either way, this is a difficult situation to solve.:/

**Al Jazeera:[] Quote:[] **

Fighters Killed in Phillipines Raid
Troops in Phillipines have killed at least seven Al-Qaeda linked fighters in an assault. Government forces had a raid on Abu Sayyaf on Sunday to capture a Malaysian man who is known as a "terror suspect" by the U.S.. A Malaysian fighter known as Marwan and Abu Benhur (commander of Abu Sayyaf) is believed to escaped with other fighters. The U.S. has a reward to 5 million dollars for the capture of Marwan (U.S. train Malaysian). He has been accused by the Phillipines of the deadly bombing in the country. U.S. says that he is the leader of the Kumpulun Mujahidin Malaysia. Also, last month, the Phillipines had killed Albader Parad who has been accused of beheadings and high-profile kidnappings.

The two sources i used for this article was Al Jazeera and World Bulletin. The similarities between these sources was that they have killed Albader Parad and Abu Sayyaf kidnapping three Red Cross guards. The differences was that Al Jazeera was more into depth than World Bulletin. The World Bulletin focused on when and how the gunbattle between Albader Parad went. Nothing more than that. Al Jazeera had a lot more quotes than World Bulletin, thus can change my opinion (next paragraph). Al Jazeera also mentioned the crimes that Albader Parad that has been accused of doing. Thi is important so that people can see what he has done to deserve his death.

My opinion on this article is that I am very happy that they have ended a life of a man who has been accused of doing a lot of crimes. Even though violence is not the answer, if he would've died, a lot of more could've been hurt. Also, it is very good for the U.S. to give a reward to the capture of Marad because with him loose, he could do more severe damage to other countries and cause a lot of more deaths. They have to end this "Abu Sayyaf" as quick as they can without any of their people dying. With then end of Abu Sayyaf, people can then live in pace and not expect random bombings. o.0

Al Jazeera: [] World Bulletin: []

North Korea Issues Nuclear Threat
North Korea says it will strengthen the nuclear program if the U.S. keeps ignoring realistic proposals and following unrealistic maneuvers. North Korea had sent a proposal to Washington that if they end the Korea War, North Kore will end its nuclear programs. Tuesday's meeting, North Korea threatened to conduct live fire-drills at the border, along the east and west coasts, a month after firing a barrage of artillery shells towards the western maritime boarder that it shares with South Korea.

The two sources I used for this article was Al Jazeera and The Observer. Both article only had one similar thing to each other and that was North Korea weaponizing its weapons to nuclear. Both article were very VERY different from each other. The Observer has people and industries quoted and Al Jazeera did not. Through these far off information, it is very hard to trust any of the article, but I have to go with The Observer because it had professionals quoted in. Having professionals quoted makes the article more truthful and it changes my thought about my opinion (next paragraph).

My opinion on this article is why drag the U.S. into this. The Korea War is between South Korea and North Korea not the U.S.. Although North Korea wants to end the war with a peace treaty, they should talk about it with the South. This way, they can end the conflict that has been going on for a while and move on to their life. Also, by ending the war, South Korea might end its nuclear program, which will be a good thing.

Al Jazeera: [] The Observer: []


 * Whaling Body Proposes Compromise**

Austrailians have intervene with whaling in Japan. Austarailians told Japan that if they won't stop whaling or at least reduce it, they will go to the International Criminal Court(ICC) and settle things from there. Though Austrailia threatens Japan, Japan says there is no need for ythe ICC to come in for it is not anything that are against people. World Wildlife Fund (WWF) has also come to help reduce whaling. If whaling stops, that could damage cultre for Japan, Norway, and Iceland. The current number of whales that can be hunt under scientifc is set at 990 whales per year.

The two sources I used for this article was Al Jazeera and The Seattle TImes. These two articles are very enciteful. They provided with the basic information about limiting or stopping whaling. They also had the International Whaling Commission (IWC) quoted. But, there were a lot of differences. The Seattle Times had information about the draft that a lot of official from countries are working on. Also, the Seattle Times had specific people quoted (Monica Medina, commissioner of the ICW and Christian Maquieria, chairman of IWC). I think that through these mass of diffrences, I believe that the Seattle Time has an upperhand of changing my thoughts on this article (next paragraph). I would put that they are working on a draft to settle things instead of a fight between Austrailia, Japan, Norway, and Iceland.

My opinion on this article is that they should not entirely stop whaling because it can significantly damge cultures that need whaling like Japan. I believe they should work on reducing the amout of whaling that should happen per year or they can do something like stop whaling for a year (so the can mate) and whale the year after. By having a lot of officials from countries getting onto this case, it would help get more ideas into this situation and could bring up new ideas. BUT, they should NEVER EVER stop whaling because its important to certain countires' culture. O:)

Al Jazeera: [] The Seattle Times: []

China's Anti-Piracy Roll Off Somalia's Expand
China has been occupied with protecing it's own country but now, they have joined alliance with the U.S., Nato, and the European Union. By having China joined alliance, the naval forces can now use China's ships to be diverted to the Somalia Bay (expansion in the western part) where attacks of pirates are all-time high. The agreement that was swet allows China to take on rotating chairmanship of the naval force that coordinates patrols. China want to take part in anti-piracy because one of their ship was hi-jacked. Also, China is eager to extend its naval reach even further. China is being closely watch due to the growth and naval reach. South East asian countries are rivals with china trying to take contol of islands.

The two sources i use for this article was Al Jazeera and Insurance Journal. Both sources were very insightful to the participation of China and anti-piracy. Also both article talk about China's ship being hi-jack. Though there weren't many similarities, there were a lot of differences between these two sources. Insurnce Journal listed the crimes pirates have acted upon. Insurnce Journal went into details about the area (like the Somalia Bay) and had a person quoted (Capatain Paul Shivers, Chief of Staff of EUNAVFOR). Also, Insurnce Journal told a little about the past of China and Somalia importing and exporting goods. Insurance Journal being more detailed and insightful means that i can really trust this article from this source. It gives me important information that BBC News did not have and sort of affected my opinon (next paragraph).

My opinon on this article is that it is good that China has joined alliance with U.S. and all that against pirates. But, pirates may have a good reason for hi-jacking ships. They might use the goods to give to teir country and to the people so that they could survive. Many horrible things could've happened to pirates and in order to survive, they need to hi-jack ships. China joining alliance with us, I hope they can work something out with the pirates so the pirates will stop hi-jacking ships so that everyone can continue with their lives and live peacefully. Both pirates and U.s have good reasons but I hope both sides gets what they want and peacefully.

BBC News: [] Insurance Journal: []

North Korea May Hold More Missle Tests
=== South Koreans reoorted that North Korea has declared a naval exculsion zone, off its west coast, meaning that they might be testing missle launches. The naval exclusion zone is near a sea that there was a breif naval clash between South Korean ships and North Korean ships in November. This missle testing zone could signal military exercises. North Korea and South Korea have had ties between eachother. In 1950-1953, the Korean War was ended by having truce not with a peace treaty. The two sources I used for this article is Al Jazeera and The New York Times. The New York Times went into detail in this article. It gave us specific numbers of missle launched (5 short range missle this Monday) and it also talked about how they are trying to reunite families that were seperated during the Korean War in 1950-1953. The similarities I found was that both articles talked about the Korean War and they both talk about North Korea missle testing. The New York Times seems more trustworthy because they spend time on this situation and talked about North Korea and South Korea's goals. By being more detailed, I can strongly support my opinon (next paragraph) and change my point of view. My opinon on this article is that they should've settled the Korean War with a peace treaty than a truce. By settling a peace treaty, they would have better lives and could live peacefully next to eachother. Also, the war ending with a truce, both North and South Korea still haven't settled their ties. They need to do that now before another Korean War can happen due to North Korea's missle testing. I hope they can do this as soon as possible before more people die. Six South Koreans have died when North Korea gave a flash flood to prevent breaking the dam. More people can be hurt/killed and that is why thwy should settle this before it is too late. Al Jazeera:[] The New York Times: [] ===

**Hong Kong Acid Attacker at Large**
There had been recent acid attacks in Hong Kong. Another acid attacked has happened for the sixth time in 2008. The attacker(s) hide on top of rooftops and they throw plastic bottles with acid down to crowded compact streets like the Temple street (which recently just happened). At least thirty people were injured and one seven year old child.They were sent to the hospital to be treated for the injuries and burns then later,they were released. The man that was suspected to have been one of the attacker has been arrested. Police had clarified that the man (in his 30's) was not one of the attacker but he had skip his court date and now, he is arrested. The six acid attacks have left at least one hundred people injuried in 2008.

The two sources I used for this article is Al Jazeera and CNN News. Al Jazeera talked mostly about the man that was arrested. CNN News talked and investigate on how anyone on the street can go onto any building and start throwing plastic bottles with acid down. CNN News really focused on the acid attacks that have happened and CNN News had a better quality picture than Al Jazeera. Both Al Jazeera and CNN News said that it was the sixth attacked that happenbed in 2008 on Temple Street. That was the only difference I saw. Both articles are very different from eachother. CNN News had more detaials and described about the attacks more than Al Jazeera. This makes me think that CNN News is more trustworthy than Al Jazeera because CNN News reported abouted the inspection about how anyone can go into one building all the way to the roof and can be the attacker.

My opinion on this article is that I am very shock because why would anyone hurt innocent people and most using acid to do it. It is just torturing the victim and that is not very cool. I think that Hong Kong police were smart to put a ransom for any information about these attacks so they can have a lead on this case. The attackers should be arrested for the consequences that have happened and be charged crime against humanity. People should be able to feel safe walking around, buying grocery and enjoying the time and city. I hope they catch the attackers and people would feel safe walking on the streets again.

Al Jazeera:[] CNN News: []

=== An Audiotape was claimed on Tuesday saying that Al-Qaeda is responsible for four kidnaps, all Europeans. Saleh Abu Mohammed, the person on the audiotape said that they would release the victims once the goverments pay a ransom. He too said that France and Spain will be informed later about the ransom. The four people were kidnaped in two units. They first captured was a Frenchmen Pierre Camatte on November 25 and then the three Spaniards on November 29. Adnkronos had provided more detailed information about where the kidnaps were taken place and how it happen. Al Jazeera did not go to deep in to this as Adnkronos. Al Jazeera showed a picture of one of the victims, Pierra Camatte. Al Jazeera showed some random photoshop picture. The similarity between these two sites were that they provided the same date when the victims were kidnapped. They had the names of the victim and the age of each. My opinion on this article is to stop Al-Quaeda because I am pretty sure they are not going to stop from there until they have all the money they want. We need to stop them to prevent more kidnaps from happening and deaths of people like the person who was killed, Briton Edwin Dyer. People are innocently being kidnap so that the kidnappers could benefit off of them. That is the wrong way to earn money and is not prideful. People should earn money by working hard instead of choosing an easy path like risking a life just for money. Also, taking the easy path would have great consequences. People should earn their money with pride and dignity. Al Jazeera: [] Adnkronos: [] ===

=== South Africa has the most HIV and Aids cases in the world. 5.7 million people out of 50 million in the population are infected with HIV and aids diseases. 300,000 premature deaths were preventible but officials didn't react soon. Nearly 1,000 South Africans die a day due to aid related diseases. Jacob Zuma, Soth Africa president are giving people anti-retroviral drugs for children under one year olds and extended treatments for soon to be mothers who have aids. United STates has promise Zuma 12 million dollars to help South Africa fight aids. Zuma's goal is to provide at least 80% with people who have aids drugs by 2011. Both articles went into depth about aids and what Prsident Jacob Zuma' goal was. Al Jazeera supported with more visual aids and was more organized than Reuters. Reuters had more quotes in the artile than Al Jazeera though. Similarities between these two were that they talked about former President Mbeki and they both had the same organization and people quoted. Both talked how the United States is going to contribute to this cause. I agree with President Zuma because children are given life and they are born with these kind of diseases. Also, be helping prevent HIV and aids infection, less people will die and the world will be less in sorrow. People need a second chance to live in life, instead of knowing their destiny and die from a disease. When new borns arrive in this world, they don't get to have a choice. They are born with this disease. That isn't fair to them. South Africa is the number one country of HIV and aids diseases. They need help to get a second chance in life and to have a happier life. Al Jazeera: [] Reuters: [] ===

Many Dead in DR Congo Boat Accident
At least 73 people were killed after a boat sank on the lake in the west of the Democratic Republic of Congo. The boat sank on Wednesday during bad weather and was not authorized for passengers. Roads are non-existence in Congo towns, leading traveling by aircrafts or boat for shipping goods and etc. Accidents are usually due to overloading, lack of maintenance, and lax of safety. In September, at least 14 people have died after their boat sank.

Both articles were very short but very into details. The Sydney Morning Herald had one extra peerson quoted than Al Jazeera and her name is Dominique Lutula. That was the only major difference i saw in the articales but there were a lot of similarities. They both mention the International Committee of the Red Corss and they both mention about 73 deaths when the boat sank that wasn't authorized for passengers. They had the same statistics. 73 people die and at least 272 survivors. Both talks about how the Red Cross are trying to recover the other bodies.

I think that they should make main roads for transportation because then, there will be less accidents and less deaths. Going by aircrafts and boats are dangerous during bad weather but going on a road is much safer. There are chances of getting kidnapped and smuggled but it is better than risking your life on air or water in bad weather. People in Congo need to make a main road so that they can prevent deaths of people. Making a main road will be benefits but also down falls but.... you are preventing people from dieing in bad weather.

Al Jazeera: [] Morning Sydney Herald: []

Somali Captors 'Tortured' Captors
A Canadian and Austrailian journalist were captured by Somalians on August 23,2008 as they were traveling to Mogadishu to a refugee camp. They were captives for 15 months, the Somalians beating and torturing them. They were doing this because tyhey wanted 1 million U.S. dollars. Both journalist were tortured by being strip down and locked in a room with no one to talk too. Also, they only have 5 bathroom breaks per day and they also got pistol whipped. Nigel Brennan and Amanda Lindhout were the captives. Brennan was chained in a room, seperated from Lindhout for 10 months.They were then release and the Somalians got the ransom they wanted.

Both sources on this article was very deep into the story and had a lot of details. The difference was that Al Jazeera had a picture of Brennan and World News Austrailia didn't. But, WOrld News Austrailia was more organized and had more details. For Example, "The SOmalians thought that since she is Canadian, she is bound to be rich". Al Jazeera said nothing like this. They both had people quoted but World NEws Austrailia had one different person quoted. HIs name is Abduhai Hassan Barise, colonel of Somali policemen. They had mostly the same people/companies quoted.

My opinion on this is kind of neutral because they need the money to help support their family but it also too is wrong to beat the journalist to get money they wanted. Somalia is a war-torn land since 1991 and they need money to afford food and to keep their survival. This could of been preventable if none of the countries got greedy and started wars just to get the resources they need. I hope we can help them out but also, prosecute those who have had done this crime for money. By helping this, this will most likely become preventale and I think life would be better for Somalians.

Al Jazeera: [|__http://english.aljazeera.net/news/africa/2009/11/20091125195343870385.html__] [|World News Austrailia:][] **Scores Die In South Sudan Clashes**

47 people had died in a attempted cattle raid. Mundari ethnic groups attacked two villages that belongsd to the Dinka Aliap tribe. 10 people were killed and 16 people were injured in the Dinka Aliap tribe. 37 bodies were found on the ground from the Mundari group. There are a lot of raids that happened mosly the previous one in September. 5,000 people were displaced and 10 people were killed. Tribal violence that has recently just happened has killed 2,000 people not just men but women and children, and left 250,000 people displaced. These tribal wars have roughly benn happening for about 20 year of war, started by south ethnic groups against each other.

Al Jazeera:__[|http://englsh.aljazeera.net/news/africa/2009/11/20091118195220341235.html]__ [|BBC:] [] ===Both sources go into depth with this situation. BBC was talking about Lou Nuer ethnic group attacking Duk Padiet in Jonglei state. Al Jazeera was talking about Mundari attcking the Dinka Aliap ethnic group, raiding cattles.Another difference is that Al Jazeera has more statistics than BBC. Also, both sources have same people/ foundations quoted. Both Al Jazeera and BBC had Kuol Diem Kuol quoted and they both mention about the United Nation. They also had one similar statistic and that was 2,000 people were killed in these recent attacks. They both talk about the election in 2011. I think they should stop these raids that only happen for cattles(and probably other things too) because a lot of civilians are dieing and they probably are innocent. Innocent people should'nt die. They haven't done anything wrong yet and they deserve to die when God wants them too (part of Catacism teaching). Killing civilians,including women and children, for cattles is ridiculously stupid. There are other ways to have more cattles. They can reproduce but you will have to wait until the new borns are grown up. Being paitience is part of life and the key to life. Paitience will help you a lot in life. ===

Afica Union Imposes Sanctions on Guinea
Africa has perform sanctions against several dozen people in Guinea who are opposing a return to constitutional order. The list has been sent to Africa Union member states, to the United Nations Security Council and to the European Union so that they can harmonise their positions and take appropriate measures. These actions include bans on travel and the freezing of assets held outside Guinea by the military leaders. They were to set after troops opened fire on September 28, at a rally in a stadium, in the capital, Conakry, where protesters were urging Moussa Dadis Camara, the country's military leader, not to stand in presidential elections planned for January. Now Camara wants to stand in the election not full-filling his commitment that he had said earlier. During the shooting at the stadium in Conakry, there were 157 deaths and at least 1,200 injured including women being publicly raped. The US government has also restricted travel to the United States by some of the ruling members as well as others who support actions that "undermine the restoration of democracy and the rule of law".

Al Jazeera: [] __[|IOL] [|:] [|http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=86&art_id=nw20091029222933977C587079]__

===[|B][|oth coverage were the same. They had the same information and people/councls.They both mention Camara, AU, EU, UN Security Council,] [|Lansana Conte, the president, and Ramtane Lamamra, the AU peace and security commissioner. The difference between both sources is that Al Jazeera had pictures to give us visualization and IOL didn't. I agree with this because if we were to say that Camara was to come to United States, he could be killing a lot of people. The massacre, if that were to happen, would greatly impact lives of others. Also, Camara cannot stand in the elctions or else there would be a great number of deaths for the election. Like in my pervious Wiki, there has been killing in all electiuons since 1992. If this keeps happening, we won't know what would happen. We have to stop this as soon as possible so that we can save lives.]===

 The International Criminal Court's chief prosecutor has asked for an investigation into Kenya's 2008 post-election violence, saying he believes crimes against humanity were committed. Mwai Kibaki(Kenyan president) and Raila Odinga(prime minister) in Nairobi has been rival ever since the December 2007 election which caused 1500 lives. Kofi Annan believes that the people who have been involve in the killings of these elections should be penalized for their violence or else the risk of violence would erupt again in the next presidential elction in 2012. Kenya has had these vilonet election not once or twice but every electin since 1992. Sources:
 * ICC Invetsigates Kenya Violence**

Al Jazeera: [|__http://english.aljazeera.net/news/africa/2009/11/200911554411399572.html__] [|BBC News:] []

Both coverage were really different from eachother but had the same general topic. Both sources went into depth with this situation happening in Kenya. The difference between both sources is that Al Jazeera said that 1500 people were killed in the December 2007 election. BBC News said that 1300 people were killed and 300,000 were injured. BBC News said that both Kenyan president and prime minister are going to co-operate with Luis Moreno-Ocampo. Both generally talked how this is inhumanity and they mentioned the same people. Both had picture to give us visualization.

My opinion about this is that people who were involved in the December 2007 election violence should be penalized for their action before more people die for the next election in 2012. Innocent people are dieing contributing to this violence because people are bribing them to do it (most African family need money and food) to keep their survival and feed their family. So, people who are running in the election are making them go eliminate their opponents by burning their house down and etc., which are killing the opponents famiily which might not even know about this violence. ICC should prosecute all who contribute to violence or else more innocent people will die in the following next electtions. People need to live their life to the fullest not dieing at a young age without reaching a certain goal. Being alive is a privlage and you should put this privlage into good use. I hope we can help African families somehow so we can help stop these violent elecions and stop peolple from dieing.

=
The International Criminal Court launched an investigation into allegations of rapes and other acts that are a sexual act perpetrated by officials of the Central African Republic. The incidents are alleged to have occurred during a coupe in October, 2002, to overthrow the current Central African Republic regime. The investigation is not currently focusing on any particular individuals. It is the fourth ICC investigation since its inception in 2002, all of which are in Africa. Sexual violence has a lingering social effect of degradation on women in African cultures. Victims describe gang rapes and public rapes in the presence of family members. Many of the victimized women have contracted HIV, leaving them stigmatized in their communities. One criminal was arrested for the actions he has done ( terrorism, unlawful killings, sexual and physical violence, including rape, and mutilations, use of child soldiers, abductions and forced labor, and burning and robbing of money). Much more criminals must be prosecuted.======

=
BBC:[] War Crimes:[] (top article only)======

=
The coverage of this article by both sources had really differnet information but was on a general topic. For instance, the article by BBC had a lot more information than the War Crime did. BBC talked more in depth about the situation and on one certain arrest. War Crime talked briefly about the general topic, a short summary in two paragraphs. No one were quoted in both sources, but they gave a few list of names. for instance, in War Crimes, they mentioned President Ange Felix Patasse and Congolese rebel leader Jean-Pierre Bamba. In BBC, they mentioned the country Sierra Leone, former Bosnian Serb leaders Ratko Mladic and Radovan Karadzic, former Peruvian president Alberto Fujimori, General Pinochet (former Chilean military leader), and Charles Taylor (a criminial who was prsecuted). BBC gave two picture; one with Charles Taylor and another picture (not sure who he is).======

=
My opinon on this article is that I am furious because of men abusing women. Everyone should be treated the same no matter what ethnicity, sex, and etc.. Criminals who commited sexually action to women should be prosecuted because it is just not right. Everyone are supose to live their life to the fullest. Also, sex is sacred. You should only have sex with someone you really love (catholism teaching). Also, by have multiple sex partners, you increase the chance of having HIV and AIDS and transmitting those diseases to people. I would prosecuted everyone who has commited rape/mollestation. Overall, BBC has gave the most information than War Criminals. War Criminals only gave a brief summary, not providing much information. BBC provided a lot of information and talked about one arrest of a person and listing out the things they have done.======