Tat,+Darren+10

Sources: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/International/2010/02/13/Activist-finally-allowed-back-in-China/UPI-64981266083334/ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8512072.stm

Summary: A rights activist by the name of Feng Zhenghu was allowed entry back into his country, China. Feng Zhenghu left China in June, and starting at April, officials in the airport would not grant him entry back into China. Feng Zhenghu spent 3 months living in the airport protesting online, and at the airport. Thousands of people passes Feng Zhenghu and is surprised that China's government won't let Feng Zhenghu back into his home. There was no clear reason of why he was not allowed back, but some people believe that it was because of him being a Rights Activist and his campaigning, although Feng Zhenghu claims that he was grateful to China. The government finally realizes that Feng deserves to go back home, and tons of people greeted him at the airport as they waited for his arrival. Now, Feng Zhenghu is back home, but he will continue to do what he did in the past.

Compare&Contrast: Both of these articles share the same information, but there was information like Feng Zhenghu being taking to the back exit, so people that were wanting to welcome never got the chance to (UPI) that was confusing because the BBC article stated that people lost contact of Feng shortly after his arrival. Does this mean Feng did meet up with his people? Or does it mean he never got to meet up with them at all. These articles have a different length, BBC is clearly much more bigger and has more detail than the UPI article. The BBC also has different titles compared to the UPI, BBC titled : "China 'airport limbo' activist allowed into Shanghai", and UPI titled: "Activist finally allowed back in China".

Opinion: My opinion about the event is that this is a great thing for Feng Zhenghu to finally be allowed back into his home, although he should have been allowed back a long time ago. It is about time that the government realizes that they should allow Feng Zhenghu back into his country/ home. My opinion about the articles is that these articles provided good details, one more than another but it's fine, and the article provides enough information to let a reader know what their reading. In other words, these articles are not confusing, and their overall good articles.