huang,+lanCy+4


 * Somali Women Stoned for Adultery**

In Mogadishu, Somalia, a 20 year old women was buried up to her waist and stoned to death in front of a crowd of about 200 people neasr to town of Wajid. Sheikh Ibrahim Abdirahman, the judge for the group al-Shabab, said that the women had an affair with an 29 year old man who was unmarried. She gave birth to a still born child and was charged of adultery. Her boyfriend was given 100 lashes.


 * BBC NEWS**: []
 * NYTIMES**: []

I thought that this killing was unecessary and definetly cruel. Just because she had an affair with an unmarried man, while she was single does not call for death. I don't get why if a women can't be "adulterly". So does that mean they're going to stay a child forever? Its just not right.

Similarities I found was was that the title contained many similar words. **BBC**: Somali Women Stoned for Adultery. **NYTIMES**: Somali Woman Stoned to Death for Adultery. Also both article stated the ages of the women and man and they both stated hoe she died and how many people cam to watch her death. Differences I fond was that the **BBC** article gave a lot more information, but the info was basicly background info. **BBC** talked about who else was stoned to death before the women got stoned and why they got stoned. Also the title of the **NTiMES** article had 2 more extra words //"to death//", otherwise both titles of both articles would be exactly the same.