Tat,+Darren+3

Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8354214.stm http://www.graphicghana.com/print_article.php?news=5116&links=/news/page.php?news=5116

A South African police officer shot and killed a 3 year old baby because he believed that the 3 year old boy was carrying a weapon, but he was actually holding up a pipe.

These two sources were pretty much similar, both sources had the same information, and some same quotes. The only difference I found was that the BBC news had more information about the Scene more than the other source. BBC also has picture while the other source does not have any. The BBC source looked more appealing than the other source. Both of these articles were clear, had the main idea brought up, and provides a lot of information, BBC had more information than the other source though.

I think that the police officer was absolutely stupid. To think that a 3 year old baby, absolutely clueless about what he is doing would be a threat to a grown man! I think that he should have not opened fire at all and he could have taken the situation a little more properly, because in the end more people got hurt including himself for being charged with murder. He got what he deserved, and it was his intimidation of a 3 year old child and his stupidity that led him to where he is now. I think both of these articles are very well written, although BBC looks more "professional" than the other source. But both of these articles are very well written, both sources gave out enough information and overall they were well written articles.